The Dresden Files > DFRPG
Alignment?
Rabidpancakes:
And if I had an alignment myself, I would lean towards Aberrant or Miscreant, LE or NE. I can play nice with others if it serves me or they've earned my respect, but I honestly have done enough things in my life where I could bury someone without a second thought. I have a really dark side that I cover up the majority of the time. And to quote the Incredible Hulk, "Don't make me angry, you wouldn't like me when I'm angry."
Wolfhowls:
Don't believe him. He's really a teddy bear. Great Guy. But yes don't piss him off he will make your life miserable. Very Painful.
Rabidpancakes:
Chaos sounds very cool, but, like the constraints of law, it gets old quick.
Good, neutrality, and evil. Good people always put others before themselves.
Neutrals put others before them, except when it's necessary to protect their own interests.
Evils are selfish. Period.
In AD+D Lawful Evils make the Best Villians, Neutral Evils are the Nastiest, and Chaotic Evils are the goons who only follow those that can beat them down.
I guess I am like a bear. Cute to look at and feed, but when I want more, I better get it. Or I eat you.
Weaverchilde:
--- Quote from: Fyrchick on June 03, 2007, 03:01:07 AM ---I'd forget girls aren't supposed to instigate or express opinions or like, do a really neato judo throw on them when they didn't heed verbal warnings. Is that Anarchist? Chaotic?
--- End quote ---
First I would say, thats hot...but yeah... I doubt your Anarchist... unless this sounds like you:
Anarchist Characters Will . . .
1. May keep his word.
2. Lie and cheat if he feels it necessary.
3. Not likely to kill an unarmed foe, but certainly knockout, attack, or beat up an unarmed foe.
4. Never kill an innocent (but may harm or kidnap).
5. Not likely to help someone without some ulterior motive (even if it's only to show-off).
6. Seldom kill for pleasure.
7. Use torture to extract information (not likely to torture for pleasure).
8. Does not work well in a group (this is the cocky, loudmouth who is likely to do as he damn well pleases).
9. Have little respect for self-discipline or authority.
10. May betray a friend.
Most people in my experience are Abberrant, rarely nicer since people don't always stop at the side of a road to help someone with a flat(even if they have the time), but few fall below this due to the sticking point of harming an innocent. most people just don't take some child on the street and use them as human shields or outright hurt them for the sake of hurting them.
That said, almost everyone could can do some very horrible things if they feel justified. Looking back when I was younger (and hopefully just less enlightened), I did a lot of things that I would not consider now... but at the same time I know that if circumstances were right.. well best to keep those thoughts out of mind least a pysch eval pop up ;D
Wolfhowls:
In real life I tend to lean towards LN. I'll fight the good fight but you better give me god damn good reason to and you better pay me well enough. The closest character from a book is a Street Samurai from Shadowrun named Argent would explain what I am talking about.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version