The Dresden Files > DFRPG Resource Collection

Custom Powers Master List (Work In Progress)

<< < (132/204) > >>

Silverblaze:
"PS: The test fight thread is up."

I must be lacking in mental capacity atm...where is this thread?

Sanctaphrax:
It's on the Play-By-Post forum.

What do you think of the changes here? Any objections?

Silverblaze:

--- Quote from: Sanctaphrax on August 15, 2012, 01:19:10 AM ---It's on the Play-By-Post forum.

What do you think of the changes here? Any objections?

--- End quote ---

Can I use the following in one exchange?


•Enhanced Accuracy (1 stress): Add 1 to the enhanced attack roll

and

•Distant Strike (2 stress): Add 3 zones to the range of the enhanced attack.
or: •Enhanced Damage (1 stress): The enhanced attack inflicts 2 additional stress.

and

•Piercing Attack (3 stress): The enhanced attack ignores all armour, regardless of the source of that armour. or  •Whirlwind Attack (3 stress): You may apply your attack to an entire zone within its range, without a penalty or a risk of hitting yourself.

and

•Flurry (4 stress): Replace the enhanced attack with up to four attacks. Each of those attacks suffers a penalty equal to the number of attacks made, but all of them benefit from whatever techniques enhanced the original enhanced attack.

In one exchange if I spend all four stress boxes?

1 - 2 - 3 - 4?

Making 2 - 4 attacks at + 1 accuracy, +2 stress (or at a distance), ignore armor (or hit a zone)?

(yes I know the attacks woudl suffer - 2 to 4 accuracy from flurry [ they still could gain +1 from the 1 stress technique however])


Sanctaphrax:
No. You pay for all the techniques you want to use on your attack at once.

So 1-2-3-4 does 10 stress.

This isn't necessarily good or bad...it makes consequences better at soaking up technique costs, but it also means you'll need your consequences more.

Should I make that more clear?

Silverblaze:

--- Quote from: Sanctaphrax on August 15, 2012, 01:53:34 AM ---No. You pay for all the techniques you want to use on your attack at once.

So 1-2-3-4 does 10 stress.

This isn't necessarily good or bad...it makes consequences better at soaking up technique costs, but it also means you'll need your consequences more.

Should I make that more clear?

--- End quote ---

Yeah, maybe.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version