The Dresden Files > DF Reference Collection
Unsolved Mysteries Version II
Serack:
--- Quote from: Cymbaline on January 26, 2011, 08:09:44 AM ---
--- Quote ----What is the mantle Ebenezer is considering for Harry?*
--- End quote ---
I don't recall this ever being answered definitively.
--- End quote ---
That's astrisked because of this comment in the origional version of this post.
--- Quote from: Phariah on January 11, 2011, 05:48:42 PM ---TC; what is the mantle Eb is talking about. its the mantle he took when he made Demonreach his sanctum.
--- End quote ---
I responded with:
--- Quote from: Serack on January 11, 2011, 06:31:36 PM ---Ok then, What does the mantle Eb is talking about entail? (semantics)
--- End quote ---
But the original "mystery" wording was used with an asterisk.
parthagenon:
I should probably un-asterisk the Amoracchius, true. It's only there because there is a more-or-less general suspicion that Thomas is probably going to end up wielding it, although there's very little concrete evidence. As for Ebenezer's mantle, that asterisk is because there is quite a bit speculation that it's linked to Demonreach and/or the original (singular) Warden. Since it isn't completely answered, but pretty much implied, it's up there with an asterisk.
For Malcolm, the question is there because of the numerous theories concerning his being an angel/KoTC/other, and the asterisk is there because so far, there all evidence points towards his being a normal human.
I really need to neaten up...
the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh:
--- Quote from: parthagenon on January 27, 2011, 04:19:51 AM ---I should probably un-asterisk the Amoracchius, true. It's only there because there is a more-or-less general suspicion that Thomas is probably going to end up wielding it.
--- End quote ---
There is ?
Have I been gone long enough that the "Harry ends up with all three swords and they get destroyed in the BAT and none of them ever get wielders" theory has fallen from favour ?
parthagenon:
--- Quote from: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on January 27, 2011, 05:28:26 AM ---There is ?
Have I been gone long enough that the "Harry ends up with all three swords and they get destroyed in the BAT and none of them ever get wielders" theory has fallen from favour ?
--- End quote ---
We know that somebody will pick them up before the BAT, and that Amoracchius, at least, will survive until the beginning of the BAT.
From Marscon:
Audience member: Um, a buch of us have been chomping at the bit and wondering, um, who’s going to wield Amoracchius and Fidelacchius and [unintelligible]
Jim: Um, yeah, ok, who’s going to get to wield the two new Swords? Um, well really, not the two new swords, but the Swords that are in Dresden’s keeping right now, and are we going to get anything more about that from Ghost Story? Probably not, nah. (Laughter)
Interviewer: How…how long will they have to wait?
Jim: I…well…oh, uh, let’s see, we’ll probably get the new…we’ll probably get the new, the new wielder of Fidelacchius in Book 14 or 15. Um, Amoracchius is gonna, uh…we’re gonna…(Jim chuckles evilly), that’s…that’s gonna be apocalypse time by the time we get [unintelligible]. Amoracchius is not one of those Swords that really rampages around the world very often, and when if does, you’ve heard about it, so…(Laughter).
Ms Duck:
I have a running bet on Molly actually; or possibly one of the other carpenter kids.
based on the arthurian priciple--
Merlin_ harry
uther_ mIcheal
arthur_harry's apprentice, uther' heir..Molly
so yes, unstar that one.. I put thomas as the least mlikely, frankly.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version