The Site > Site Suggestions & Support
Topic Decay question
Shecky:
--- Quote from: balltongue9600 on August 25, 2010, 02:24:15 PM ---I've been quoting it as WoJ. However it is a summary so I don't consider it 100% word for word cannon.
--- End quote ---
It's as close to canon as we're going to get unless we get one of those newfangled thought transcribers and hook Jim up to it for a couple of weeks straight. ;D
--- Quote from: balltongue9600 on August 25, 2010, 02:24:15 PM ---You've read my topic where the origional asker of one of the questions wrote:
--- End quote ---
Not sure what this has to do with things in the WoJ board.
--- Quote from: balltongue9600 on August 25, 2010, 02:24:15 PM ---With reguards to the "summarized" Q&A from the now WoJ'd thread:
I may make use of Priscillie's display case contenders for that WoJ clarification though. Although the sticky does say to nominate it after it's been locked.
--- End quote ---
Good plan. It's always nice to see people keeping the place clean. :D
Serack:
--- Quote from: Shecky on August 25, 2010, 02:34:30 PM ---Not sure what this has to do with things in the WoJ board.
--- End quote ---
The topic that Priscilla just added to WoJ was a summary of Q&A's. The quote above is a more detailed version of a particular Q&A in that summary now in the WoJ board.
Shecky:
--- Quote from: balltongue9600 on August 25, 2010, 02:38:51 PM ---The topic that Priscilla just added to WoJ was a summary of Q&A's. The quote above is a more detailed version of a particular Q&A in that summary now in the WoJ board.
--- End quote ---
Okay, it's still WoJ, summarized or otherwise. I guess what I was asking was your point in quoting Laura's post.
Chiana:
--- Quote from: Shecky on August 25, 2010, 02:34:30 PM ---It's as close to canon as we're going to get unless we get one of those newfangled thought transcribers and hook Jim up to it for a couple of weeks straight. ;D
--- End quote ---
I would PAY MONEY for that! ;D
Serack:
--- Quote from: Shecky on August 25, 2010, 02:42:56 PM ---Okay, it's still WoJ, summarized or otherwise. I guess what I was asking was your point in quoting Laura's post.
--- End quote ---
I guess the point is, if the Summary is WoJ, than Laura's post should be treated as such (and thus preserved as such) too.
Edit: To my knowledge untill today, all the WoJ topics preserved in that board (other than the twitter post, which still is, just in another forum), were litteral posts by the man himself. Saving the Q&A as WoJ, I agree is viable, it just opens new ground, so I was pointing out Laura's post too.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version