McAnally's (The Community Pub) > Display Case
DISPROVE THIS
iago:
The use of rape as an example in this discussion ends right now. Touchy topic. Don't go there.
Priscellie:
So in Changes, when (click to show/hide)Harry eats potato hash browns in front of Marcone while Molly is waiting in the car, does that make Hendricks and Gard Cowl and Kumori?
This discussion is confusing.
ballplayer72:
point taken.
Back on topic of OP: I like the time travel theory, if for no other reason than I like molly's character and would love the development it would take to get her from Molly to Mab.
Somehow I don't see it happening though.
Conversely, maybe harry is the Erlking (or thomas)? Same situation of problematic time travel, just sub in harry (or thomas since he's a hunter) for molly and erl for mab. Think about it, the erlking is such a bad mofo, but one of the aspects mentioned about him is that he's a PROTECTOR OF CHILDREN. Sound like anyone we know?
ballplayer72:
--- Quote from: Priscellie on June 02, 2010, 09:18:55 PM ---So when Harry eats potato hash browns in front of Marcone while Molly is waiting in the car, does that make Hendricks and Gard Cowl and Kumori?
This discussion is confusing.
--- End quote ---
it does indeed, but only if the potato hash browns have bacon and cheese on them. The bacon is the dead giveaway ;D
Mickey Finn:
Did we ever get this statement sorted out?
"Who NEVER uses whatsoever power they have to get what they want? = Who wouldn't use whatsoever power they have to get what they want."
Because they do not equal each other. "Who NEVER uses whatsoever power they have to get what they want? = Who is so pure that they have NEVER, EVER used power to get what they want?"
Cause I my eyes start to glaze over when people argue different arguments and they think they're arguing the same point.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version