The Dresden Files > DFRPG
power system
svb1972:
--- Quote from: Tush Hog on January 07, 2010, 10:32:29 PM ---I agree. Two orders of magnitude wouldn't even do the difference justice.
I see it as the The Almighty.
....then the rest fight over the scraps of power he allows them to have. ;D
--- End quote ---
WHere do you see that at all in the Books?
Michael refers to him as the All Mighty (but he's way way biased)
Mab as the White God
Dresden basically says "There's a White God and he works in weird and subtle ways and who knows how powerful he is.."
Harry doesn't view Ms Duck as any less dangerous and powerful as Michael. SO there's no concrete proof that Odin is any less powerful than Michael's White God. Except our real world biases.
Piotr1600:
IMO, since Iago is and has been "elbow deep in the guts of the game" as it were, I think that his is an informed view of the actual, current game mechanics & structure, precocious werewolf or not. :)
SVB, I can well understand - and much applaud - that when *you* run things, in your version, you can and should re-rank and re-relative-ize (Is that a word?) to your hearts & your players hearts content.
As long as your session runs satisfactorily, and a good time is had, who cares?
For me, that's kind of a cool thing about a good quality gaming system - you can take the basic framework, and mutate it to serve your own ends, group gaming style and such.
And Mab, The WG, Odin? Really, it doesn't matter power-wise above a certain point - it's not like Mab dropping a 4000 ton weight on you kills you any less than the WG dropping a 4001 ton weight on you.
At that point any player is so far out of their league that the relative powers - from the gamers POV - count for very little. It's completely out of the realm of serious contest and into Looney Tunes, as Harry says.
But for myself, geek that I am - I am truly looking forward to getting my big sweaty mitts on a copy, learning the FATE game mechanics and the "work" parts of the system, and having a great time with it!
svb1972:
--- Quote from: Piotr1600 on January 08, 2010, 03:52:04 PM ---IMO, since Iago is and has been "elbow deep in the guts of the game" as it were, I think that his is an informed view of the actual, current game mechanics & structure, precocious werewolf or not. :)
SVB, I can well understand - and much applaud - that when *you* run things, in your version, you can and should re-rank and re-relative-ize (Is that a word?) to your hearts & your players hearts content.
As long as your session runs satisfactorily, and a good time is had, who cares?
For me, that's kind of a cool thing about a good quality gaming system - you can take the basic framework, and mutate it to serve your own ends, group gaming style and such.
And Mab, The WG, Odin? Really, it doesn't matter power-wise above a certain point - it's not like Mab dropping a 4000 ton weight on you kills you any less than the WG dropping a 4001 ton weight on you.
At that point any player is so far out of their league that the relative powers - from the gamers POV - count for very little. It's completely out of the realm of serious contest and into Looney Tunes, as Harry says.
But for myself, geek that I am - I am truly looking forward to getting my big sweaty mitts on a copy, learning the FATE game mechanics and the "work" parts of the system, and having a great time with it!
--- End quote ---
I never said I wasn't looking forward to seeing the game mechanics, or that I thought a guide to show the relative powers of the various groups would not be cool.
I just questioned where in the Canon of the books there is corroborating evidence for the power structure the way Iago has it setup.
It's not even about running the game and re-ranking based on what I think.
I'm more trying to figure out where the OP's ranking is coming from, and what in the books supports it, because in my reading of the books I don't see a convincing argument to backup his breakdown.
chadu:
--- Quote from: svb1972 on January 08, 2010, 06:30:23 PM ---I'm more trying to figure out where the OP's ranking is coming from, and what in the books supports it, because in my reading of the books I don't see a convincing argument to backup his breakdown.
--- End quote ---
Since I wrote up the power-rankings of the plot-device level folks, here's my thinking in three different flavors.
1. Mab speaks of Uriel with respect (as more or less a peer, from my reading) in SMALL FAVOR.
2. Uriel works for the Almighty.
3. The Faerie Mothers are more powerful (but more constrained) than the Faerie Queens as noted in SUMMER KNIGHT.
These three facts lead to two power comparisons:
Almighty:Archangels::Mothers:Queens
Really, the more intresting debate here is "are the Mothers equal to or greater in power to the Almighty?" because the Mothers already outrank Mab in sheer power.
So, I made a first cut with a rough ranking:
A. Almighty
B. Mothers
C. Archangels/Queens
Taking another angle on things:
1. We know from Lash that Lasciel was around when the universe/multiverse/anything that's not outside the Outer Gates was created from the void.
2. Lasciel was just an angel, outranked by Archangels, outranked by the Almighty.
3. The Faerie Mothers are somehow involved in maintaining the natural order of the universe. Therefore, they are part of Creation.
4. I assume that the Creator is more powerful than the constituent parts of Creation.
(Though a good debate can be had here, too, on point 4 -- is an automotive engineer more powerful than a car?)
To take even another angle, the more powerful an entity is, the less mortals seem to directly interact with them, face-to-face. Harry's chatting with Mab all the dang time, not so much with Uriel, once with the Mothers, and no one we know of has had a face-to-face the Almighty.
Lastly, it's called THE ALMIGHTY. That's "all mighty." (It's what it says on the tin.) Would Mab ever refer to an entity that way in comparison to herself, even with a big sneer?
In all cases, Mab is apparently not on the same level as the as the Almighty.
So, barring a tvtropes-esque Word of God from Jim here, I'm gonna come out and say:
The Almighty > Mab
svb1972:
Well thought out, very sound logic.
I have a question though.
When does Mab ever refer to him at the Almighty? when does anyone except Michael refer to him as the Almighty?
Mab repeatedly refers to him as the White God. (To differentiate him from other Gods).
I'm just now rereading Grave Peril so Michael has just been introduced, I will pay close attention to this particular detail.
I'm not saying you don't make an interesting case. Because you do, I'm just not sure the quotes from the book really support it. But, I can't quote page numbers and books yet. So I'll come back when I can, and either agree or bring up an well documented argument.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version