McAnally's (The Community Pub) > Author Craft
mechanics of faith in urban fantasy: a notion for a project
belial.1980:
It's an interesting proposition. I always applaud somebody who's eager to think outside the box and try something new.
As has been mentioned, I think the issue lies with rationality serving as the trump card. I'm reminded of the movie Boogeyman starring Barry Watson, where the protagonist keeps reminding himself, "Don't be scared...don't be scared..." because if he can face the fear, the boogeyman can't get him.
One thing that I thought might be interesting is to really play up the psychological aspect. You could use some layered versions of reality, akin to the way that Richard Kelly does in his movie Donnie Darko or the way that Ken Kesey did in One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest Neil Gaiman's Neverwhere is another example of how two separate levels of reality can coexist.
I think a device like you're suggesting would be more effective if the reader can't always guess which layer of reality the characters are encountering.
I think you could also play up on the fear/paranoia aspect.
Example: Poor Jake beleives in magic and the occult and whatnot. This leads to his being drained by a vampire. The police, rational guardians of rational people living in a ::rational:: society find a human corpse drained of blood. Word leaks out to the press. People begin to talk. They jump at shadows or hang garlic cloves over their doors. This paranoia leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy of somebody else dying, and the paranoia of vampires grows even more...
I dunno if either of those ideas tickle your fancy at all. However you decide to run with it, good luck.
the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh:
--- Quote from: meg_evonne on April 28, 2009, 03:24:23 AM ---It seems this would create a base of ever increasing rationalist society, immune. The base premise that I'm having difficulty is the assumption that a rationalist not able to recognize science in a situation would somehow be vulnerable? Wouldn't a rationalist just stay firmly in rationality and acknowledge that all science is not known and be invulnerable to the effect? Sort of a Sherlock Holmes type resistance to magic?
--- End quote ---
I was thinking that seeing something inexplicable and acknowledging that it is inexplicable in the terms you have is what makes you vulnerable to it. Whether you think of it as being magic that is science-like and works rationally or inexplicable miraculous magic being of secondary import there.
the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh:
--- Quote from: meg_evonne on April 28, 2009, 03:24:23 AM ---It seems this would create a base of ever increasing rationalist society, immune.
--- End quote ---
Yep. This seems to me to fit rather well with a "secret history" that exists alongside our real history; one of the problems I often have with urban fantasy is that it seems implausible for all these supernatural powers to have existed alongside our own for centuries and never had any real impact, and in this case, the premise gives me that for free.
the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh:
--- Quote from: belial.1980 on April 28, 2009, 03:58:48 AM ---It's an interesting proposition. I always applaud somebody who's eager to think outside the box and try something new.
--- End quote ---
Thank you.
--- Quote ---As has been mentioned, I think the issue lies with rationality serving as the trump card. I'm reminded of the movie Boogeyman starring Barry Watson, where the protagonist keeps reminding himself, "Don't be scared...don't be scared..." because if he can face the fear, the boogeyman can't get him.
--- End quote ---
I'm thinking that if you've got so far as having to remind yourself, you're already lost. It's about underlying fundamental axioms rather than things you can easily consciously choose at that level.
--- Quote ---One thing that I thought might be interesting is to really play up the psychological aspect.
I think a device like you're suggesting would be more effective if the reader can't always guess which layer of reality the characters are encountering.
--- End quote ---
Depends a lot on whose viewpoint I'm using; I think it might well want more than one, a rationalist and someone who is steeped in the magic.
--- Quote ---Example: Poor Jake beleives in magic and the occult and whatnot. This leads to his being drained by a vampire. The police, rational guardians of rational people living in a ::rational:: society find a human corpse drained of blood. Word leaks out to the press. People begin to talk. They jump at shadows or hang garlic cloves over their doors. This paranoia leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy of somebody else dying, and the paranoia of vampires grows even more...
--- End quote ---
That is a direction in which things could go, yes. I think the balance needs to be slightly different, though; if this fictional universe remains on the surface indistinguishable from our reality, it can't be that easy for vampire panics to enable vampires. The counterbalance there is... well, I'm sure I've seen horror movies where the rationalist authority figure looks at a corpse and is sure it's just a corpse and it later becomes a vampire/zombie/whatever and starts killing, whereas in this world if a vampire is imitiating a corpse and a doctor confrims it's a corpse, there's a high likelihood that that would in and of itself transform the vampire into a corpse, perhaps.
Agravaine:
Your premise is actually pretty close to a movie called Skeleton Key starring Kate Hudson. The evil plot only succeeds in Skeleton Key because Kate Hudson's character has been slowly brought around into believing in Voodoo. If she remained an unbeliever (as she had been in the beginning), it couldn't have worked on her.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version